Steve Ball Diary
|
|
|
Monday July 21 Tuesday July 22 Wednesday July 23 Thursday July 24 Friday July 25 Saturday July 26 Sunday July 27 Read the archive |
Monday July 28 Tuesday July 29 Wednesday July 30 Thursday July 31 Friday August 01 Saturday August 02 Sunday August 03 |
|
As mentioned here sometime last month, I played solo Jill and Tom Wear's wedding a few weeks ago and forgot that this picture was taken just before the ceremony:
Seeing this photo reminds me of my 'yellow' phase during SGC and Roadshow shows in 1999 and 2000. Does anyone besides me miss those fashion-challenged days? * * * Mail today from DavidS forwarded from RF regarding potential use of an ironically twisted quote from "Exposure" -- RF feels it would be inappropriate, and he is correct. Voice manipulation in audio editing tools is so easy today. However, despite the irony-value of the original inspiration for the beginning of the instrumental piece "BootlegTV, an even better solution has arisen in the flames of the rejected quote: I'm going to approach the Vicar about doing a voice over. His voice also carries a certain irony and still builds on the 1980 Exposure original. How even more appropriate.
* * * The dilemma now: where to draw the line? This will take some consideration and creativity. Need to keep listening and open my ears to alternative solutions. One obvious issue: the mastering only ever amplifies (or squashes) what is already in the mixes. In this case, the mixes were mixed on my system as if they were the finished product. One other not so obvious issue: my studio has a lot of ambient background noise: PCs in the closet, white noise from Seattle, misc background noise from my building. And another: my 'near field' monitors are about 2 feet further back than they should be for critical 'sweet spot' listening. All of these have led to unmastered tracks that sound good (to my ears) in my studio, sound fine while driving amidst background noise in my car, and sound too bright to average ears in very quiet listening environment. Mastering (not to mention mixing, arranging, orchestrating) are very subjective. The good news in this: I know what I am after in both sound quality and tone. * * * Half the battle in making art (whether music, painting, photography, writing) is knowing (or discovering) what you like. The other half of the battle is in 'showing up ' -- that is getting off your duff and working on it every day. If these two elements are active, the rest takes care of itself. Listened to some of my favorite CDs today to get a sense of how the recent masters hold up against known great CDs:
These CDs sound great in a boombox or in an expensive sound system. The vocals are crisp, clear, and way up front. The background instrumentation is clean and each instrument is woven into a coherent image. Interesting how little like "being in a room with live musicians" any of these CDs really sound. Observation: I'm not interested in 'audio verite' -- I'm nore interested in 'emotional verite.' It's a bit like my recent 'Drawing of the Day" project that has evolved into the cover artwork fot the Box Set - I'm not after realism - I'm interested in telling a high-contrast story in a language that is extra-ordinary, larger (and more colorful) than mundane day to day, just-doing-my-job life. And now, back to listening to the recent masters..Hmmm... I'm not very happy. So, what to do?
* * * * * * Congratulations to Martin and Cecilia and Balthasar Schwutke for the birth of Béla Sebastian Schwutke!
* * * * * * Some good exchanges with and Travis about the ongoing mastering conundrum. The bright side: I've learned a great deal in the process. The dark side: it is clear there is some work that I must not do to recalibrate and DIM (do it myself.) Translation: I'm going to re-mix some of the pieces that have some sibilance and EQ issues. This means, once again, another production delay.
* * * After nearly 17 years of watching and making GC courses happen all over the globe, it always comes down to this: one person delivers a space and the rest falls into place. it is not magic, or rocket science, or even difficult. It just takes one person with the will and the means to make it happen. * * * SBRS duo at Pitcairn Scott Gallery this evening. A great crowd including John and Cloe and many friends. A strong show and a strong show of support. * * *
http://www.thestranger.com/current/feature.html Interesting parallels to Seattle Circle struggles. * * * Seattle Circle open board meeting this evening to discuss what to do with HQ. A good turn out and a somewhat surprising turn of events. Looks like we may be letting go to make room for an unknown, but potentially better, future.
* * *
Can you say "Herdim replacement" ? Sure,... I knew you could.
* * * Also, mail sent from Joel today to the SC community about decision to let HQ go so that we may discover a better future. Diplomacy and effective action wafting nicely from our new president.
* * *
* * * Also new SC board members are in place and ready to roll for a new year of increased potential hiding within short term uncertainties.
* * * More mastering struggles. End of this process: where are you? * * *
* * * |